[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimuPK=1+xNMKfV=G1sSG60+=fa7eA3142JJZZ6p@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:34:48 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux Driver Project <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Replace ioctls with sysfs interface
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org> wrote:
> Creates per-device sysfs nodes in /sys/block/zram<id>/
> Currently following stats are exported:
> - disksize
> - num_reads
> - num_writes
> - invalid_io
> - zero_pages
> - orig_data_size
> - compr_data_size
> - mem_used_total
>
> By default, disksize is set to 0. So, to start using
> a zram device, fist write a disksize value and then
> initialize device by writing any positive value to
> initstate. For example:
>
> # initialize /dev/zram0 with 50MB disksize
> echo 50*1024*1024 | bc > /sys/block/zram0/disksize
> echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/initstate
>
> When done using a disk, issue reset to free its memory
> by writing any positive value to reset node:
>
> echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset
>
> This change also obviates the need for 'rzscontrol' utility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Looks good to me (but I'm not a sysfs guy).
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
> /* Module params (documentation at end) */
> -static unsigned int num_devices;
> +unsigned int num_devices;
> +
> +static void zram_stat_inc(u32 *v)
> +{
> + *v = *v + 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void zram_stat_dec(u32 *v)
> +{
> + *v = *v - 1;
> +}
> +
> +static void zram_stat64_add(struct zram *zram, u64 *v, u64 inc)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&zram->stat64_lock);
> + *v = *v + inc;
> + spin_unlock(&zram->stat64_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void zram_stat64_sub(struct zram *zram, u64 *v, u64 dec)
> +{
> + spin_lock(&zram->stat64_lock);
> + *v = *v - dec;
> + spin_unlock(&zram->stat64_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void zram_stat64_inc(struct zram *zram, u64 *v)
> +{
> + zram_stat64_add(zram, v, 1);
> +}
These could probably use atomic_inc(), atomic64_inc(), and friends, no?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists