[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin7_fKxTzE2rngh1Ew5Ss8F_Aw0s9Gz6ySug6SX@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 21:57:42 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux Driver Project <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] Use percpu buffers
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org> wrote:
> @@ -303,38 +307,41 @@ static int zram_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
> zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_ZERO))
> zram_free_page(zram, index);
>
> - mutex_lock(&zram->lock);
> + preempt_disable();
> + zbuffer = __get_cpu_var(compress_buffer);
> + zworkmem = __get_cpu_var(compress_workmem);
> + if (unlikely(!zbuffer || !zworkmem)) {
> + preempt_enable();
> + goto out;
> + }
The per-CPU buffer thing with this preempt_disable() trickery looks
overkill to me. Most block device drivers seem to use mempool_alloc()
for this sort of thing. Is there some reason you can't use that here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists