[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C607998.90509@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:56:40 -0700
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
CC: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@...il.com>,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>,
Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@...iler.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
On 08/09/2010 02:28 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:15 +0300, Mihai Donțu wrote:
>>
>> Wait. I don't think we're on the same page here. I'm talking about message
>> signing (which does not require the receiving end to have any key - it's the
>> same plain text e-mail with a blob after it) while you refer to actually
>> encrypting the message. Mm? Or am I being extremely slow today? :-)
>
> Only when you assume that Exchange would pass signed messages without
> corrupting them. It really is that broken.
>
figured the encryption would be kind of a last resort situation..but if
it's that broken to where it wont pass it along without corrupting, then
the best solution is to figure out what Microsoft needs in terms of
encoding, i.e. is there a way to have the scanner scan but not throw
everything around after it scans.(if this is what it's doing)
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists