linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: remove __phys_reloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Aug 2010 08:22:34 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: remove __phys_reloc_hide

Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com> writes:

> remove unnecessary use of RELOC_HIDE(). It only does simple addition of ptr
> and offset, and in this case, offset 0, does nothing. It does NOT do anything
> with linker relocation things. I could find no reason to use it.

It's for the benefit of the compiler, we've had miscompilations
due to undefined overflow for addresses in the past. The optimizer
assumes this won't happen.

Given the x86-64 version normally doesn't overflow, but it's
still safer to have it.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/