linux-kernel - Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 1/2] rtc: rtc-lpc32xx: Introduce RTC driver for the LPC32XX SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100810153448.17443314@linux.lan.towertech.it>
Date:	Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:34:48 +0200
From:	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
To:	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Cc:	wellsk40@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Durgesh Pattamatta <durgesh.pattamatta@....com>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 1/2] rtc: rtc-lpc32xx: Introduce RTC driver
 for  the LPC32XX SoC

On Mon,  9 Aug 2010 09:17:29 -0700
wellsk40@...il.com wrote:

> +
> +	retval = request_irq(rtc->irq, lpc32xx_rtc_alarm_interrupt,
> +		IRQF_DISABLED, "rtcalarm", rtc);
> +	if (retval < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't request interrupt\n");
> +		goto err_free_irq;
> +	}

 if the driver can work without the alarm irq you
 can convert this to a non fatal warning.

 having an rtc without alarms is much better than having none.

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/