[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100810161627.GB6893@lenovo>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:16:27 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running
perfctrs
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 09:42:00AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 09.08.10 16:02:45, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > > @@ -1222,14 +1245,12 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
> > > regs = args->regs;
> > >
> > > apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> >
> > If only I'm not missing something this apic_write should go up to
> > "case DIE_NMIUNKNOWN" site, no?
>
> This seems to be code from the non-nmi implementation and can be
> removed at all, which should be a separate patch. The vector is
> already set up.
>
> -Robert
>
No, this is just a short way to unmask LVTPC (which is required for
cpus). Actually lookig into this snippet I found that in p4 pmu
I've made one redundant unmaksing operation. will update as only
this area settle down.
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists