[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1281484174-32174-2-git-send-email-ppannuto@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:49:33 -0700
From: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ppannuto@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
magnus.damm@...il.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca, gregkh@...e.de,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] platform: Use drv->driver.bus instead of assuming platform_bus_type
In theory (although not *yet* in practice), a driver being passed
to platform_driver_probe might have driver.bus set to something
other than platform_bus_type. Locking drv->driver.bus is always
correct.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>
---
drivers/base/platform.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 4d99c8b..b69ccb4 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -539,12 +539,12 @@ int __init_or_module platform_driver_probe(struct platform_driver *drv,
* if the probe was successful, and make sure any forced probes of
* new devices fail.
*/
- spin_lock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
+ spin_lock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
drv->probe = NULL;
if (code == 0 && list_empty(&drv->driver.p->klist_devices.k_list))
retval = -ENODEV;
drv->driver.probe = platform_drv_probe_fail;
- spin_unlock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock);
if (code != retval)
platform_driver_unregister(drv);
--
1.7.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists