linux-kernel - Re: Dead Config in mm/percpu.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTik-DkN7gUwTuquWxA-iziHyonG9ijWb4=K8WUo=@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:26:45 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Christian Dietrich <stettberger@...ucode.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dead Config in mm/percpu.c

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:12, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 07/21/2010 11:22 AM, Christian Dietrich wrote:
>> We found, that CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_KM is a dead symbol, so it isn't defined
>> anywhere. Cause of that the percpu_km.c is never included anywhere. Is
>> this a intended dead symbol, for use in out of tree development, or is
>> this just an error?
>
> Oh, it's new code waiting to be used.  It's for cases where SMP is
> used w/o MMU.  IIRC, it was blackfin.

yep.  unfortunately, we're in the middle of making a release on top of
2.6.34.x.  hopefully we should be able to get a patch out for the
2.6.37 merge window at the latest.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/