linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix CONFIG_CROSS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100810073317.F2A8C40542@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@...il.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE issue in .config

> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> Yes, this make sense to me.  It's not clear to me why we ever needed
> >> the conditional assignment of an empty CROSS_COMPILE (that code predates
> >> the start of git history) [...]
> >
> > Perhaps someone used make --warn-undefined-variables.
> 
> Are there any other comments or is the patch valid? Should I resend it
> as a new thread?

The patch is fine.  The comments were just about how it might have gotten
to be how it was before now.

Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/