[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1008111505420.2372@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:06:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd: Remove redundant NULL check upon kfree()
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> jbd: Remove redundant NULL check upon kfree().
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
> ---
> fs/jbd/transaction.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> index 5ae71e7..5e98130 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> @@ -232,8 +232,7 @@ repeat_locked:
>
> lock_map_acquire(&handle->h_lockdep_map);
> out:
> - if (unlikely(new_transaction)) /* It's usually NULL */
> - kfree(new_transaction);
> + kfree(new_transaction);
This doesn't seem entirely redundant, as it is optimized (via the
unlikely() hint) for the opposite case than what kfree() is optimized for
(kfree() assumes that the pointer is likely non-NULL, while the code above
assumes that the pointer si likely NULL).
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists