[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201008110411.38382.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:11:38 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, david@...g.hm,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pavel@....cz, florian@...kler.org, swetland@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
On Tuesday, August 10, 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> 2010/8/9 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
> > On Monday, August 09, 2010, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
...
>
> > Anyway, as I said I'm not opposed to the idea of using a special type of
> > objects for collecting debug information on wakeup events, so please free to
> > submit patches modifying the current mainline kernel code in that direction.
> >
>
> How do you prefer to handle your pci wakeup events? Add a handle to
> every device or pci device? Or use a global handle to avoid the race
> and report wakeup events for debugging separately?
The latter, maybe?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists