lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:56:09 +0200
From:	Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
To:	Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@...nellabs.com>
CC:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	Pete Eberlein <pete@...soray.com>, <mrechberger@...il.com>,
	<gregkh@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault:  0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>]  em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]

Hello Devin,

Yes i can confirm it was my mistake, with video4linux2 it works.

--
Sander

Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 8:31:56 PM, you wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab@...radead.org> wrote:
>> Em 11-08-2010 12:58, Pete Eberlein escreveu:
>>> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 09:25 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>> Hello Devin,
>>>>
>>>> Yes it's completely reproducible for a change:
>>>>
>>>> ffmpeg -f video4linux -r 25 -s 720x576 -i /dev/video0 out.flv
>>>> gave an error:
>>>
>>> Use -f video4linux2.
>>>
>>> The -f video4linux option uses the old video4linux1 API.  I have seen
>>> similar strange behavior when I used that ffmpeg option with a v4l2
>>> driver I am developing.  Also, ffmpeg does not use libv4l.
>>
>> Still, we have a bug to fix. The driver shouldn't generating a PANIC if accessed
>> via V4L1 API.

> I agree with Mauro completely.  There is nothing userland should be
> able to do which results in a panic (and I have no reason to believe
> Pete was suggesting otherwise).  That said, it's really useful to know
> that this is some sort of v4l1 backward compatibility problem.

> I'll see if I can reproduce this here.

> Thanks,

> Devin




-- 
Best regards,
 Sander                            mailto:linux@...elenboom.it

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ