[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1281566667-7821-2-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:44:23 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jaxboe@...ionio.com
Cc: vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Do not idle if slice_idle=0
o do not idle either on cfq queue or service tree if slice_idle=0. User does
not want any queue or service tree idling. Currently even if slice_idle=0,
we were waiting for request to finish before expiring the queue and that
can lead to lower queue depths.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index eb4086f..8830569 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -1839,6 +1839,9 @@ static bool cfq_should_idle(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
BUG_ON(!service_tree);
BUG_ON(!service_tree->count);
+ if (!cfqd->cfq_slice_idle)
+ return false;
+
/* We never do for idle class queues. */
if (prio == IDLE_WORKLOAD)
return false;
@@ -1879,7 +1882,7 @@ static void cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
/*
* idle is disabled, either manually or by past process history
*/
- if (!cfqd->cfq_slice_idle || !cfq_should_idle(cfqd, cfqq))
+ if (!cfq_should_idle(cfqd, cfqq))
return;
/*
--
1.7.1.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists