linux-kernel - [019/111] bio, fs: update RWA_MASK, READA and SWRITE to match the corresponding BIO_RW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100811235457.320244899@clark.site>
Date:	Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:54:00 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Subject: [019/111] bio, fs: update RWA_MASK, READA and SWRITE to match the corresponding BIO_RW_* bits

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

commit aca27ba9618276dd2f777bcd5a1419589ccf1ca8 upstream.

Commit a82afdf (block: use the same failfast bits for bio and request)
moved BIO_RW_* bits around such that they match up with REQ_* bits.
Unfortunately, fs.h hard coded RW_MASK, RWA_MASK, READ, WRITE, READA
and SWRITE as 0, 1, 2 and 3, and expected them to match with BIO_RW_*
bits.  READ/WRITE didn't change but BIO_RW_AHEAD was moved to bit 4
instead of bit 1, breaking RWA_MASK, READA and SWRITE.

This patch updates RWA_MASK, READA and SWRITE such that they match the
BIO_RW_* bits again.  A follow up patch will update the definitions to
directly use BIO_RW_* bits so that this kind of breakage won't happen
again.

Neil also spotted missing RWA_MASK conversion.

Stable: The offending commit a82afdf was released with v2.6.32, so
this patch should be applied to all kernels since then but it must
_NOT_ be applied to kernels earlier than that.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Reported-and-bisected-by: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
Root-caused-by: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 include/linux/fs.h |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
  *
  */
 #define RW_MASK		1
-#define RWA_MASK	2
+#define RWA_MASK		16
 #define READ 0
 #define WRITE 1
-#define READA 2		/* read-ahead  - don't block if no resources */
-#define SWRITE 3	/* for ll_rw_block() - wait for buffer lock */
+#define READA			16 /* readahead - don't block if no resources */
+#define SWRITE			17 /* for ll_rw_block(), wait for buffer lock */
 #define READ_SYNC	(READ | (1 << BIO_RW_SYNCIO) | (1 << BIO_RW_UNPLUG))
 #define READ_META	(READ | (1 << BIO_RW_META))
 #define WRITE_SYNC_PLUG	(WRITE | (1 << BIO_RW_SYNCIO) | (1 << BIO_RW_NOIDLE))

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/