linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/16] Provide a zero-copy method on KVM virtio-net.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1281509704.3391.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:55:04 -0700
From:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To:	xiaohui.xin@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	davem@...emloft.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	jdike@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/16] Provide a zero-copy method on KVM
 virtio-net.

On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 23:01 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 18:43 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
> > > Also I found some vhost performance regression on the new
> > > kernel with tuning. I used to get 9.4Gb/s, now I couldn't get it. 
> > 
> > I forgot to mention the kernel I used 2.6.36 one. And I found the
> > native
> > host BW is limited to 8.0Gb/s, so the regression might come from the
> > device driver not vhost.
> 
> Something is very interesting, when binding ixgbe interrupts to cpu1,
> and running netperf/netserver on cpu0, the native host to host
> performance is still around 8.0Gb/s, however, the macvtap zero copy
> result is 9.0Gb/s.
> 
> root@...alhost ~]# netperf -H 192.168.10.74 -c -C -l60 -T0,0 -- -m 64K
> TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.10.74 (192.168..
> 10.74) port 0 AF_INET : cpu bind
> Recv   Send    Send                          Utilization       Service Demand
> Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed              Send     Recv     Send    Recv
> Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput  local    remote   local   remote
> bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/s  % S      % S      us/KB   us/KB
> 
>  87380  16384  65536    60.00      9013.59   53.01    8.21     0.963   0.597
> 
> Below is perf top output:
> 
>               578.00  6.5% copy_user_generic_string   
>               381.00  4.3% vmx_vcpu_run                
>               250.00  2.8% schedule                    
>               207.00  2.3% vhost_get_vq_desc           
>               204.00  2.3% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave      
>               197.00  2.2% translate_desc              
>               193.00  2.2% memcpy_fromiovec            
>               162.00  1.8% gup_pte_range   
> 
> We can compare your results with mine to see any difference.

When binding vhost thread to cpu3, qemu I/O thread to cpu2, macvtap zero
copy patch can get 9.4Gb/s. 

TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.10.74 (192.168.10.74) port 0 AF_INET : cpu bind
Recv   Send    Send                          Utilization       Service Demand
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed              Send     Recv     Send    Recv
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput  local    remote   local   remote
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/s  % S      % S      us/KB   us/KB

 87380  16384  65536    60.00      9408.19   55.69    8.45     0.970   0.589

Shirley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/