[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100811235503.961236282@clark.site>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:55:12 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, len.brown@...el.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [091/111] x86: Fix out of order of gsi
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
commit fad539956c9e69749a03f7817d22d1bab87657bf upstream.
Iranna D Ankad reported that IBM x3950 systems have boot
problems after this commit:
|
| commit b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30
|
| x86/pci: update pirq_enable_irq() to setup io apic routing
|
The problem is that with the patch, the machine freezes when
console=ttyS0,... kernel serial parameter is passed.
It seem to freeze at DVD initialization and the whole problem
seem to be DVD/pata related, but somehow exposed through the
serial parameter.
Such apic problems can expose really weird behavior:
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x10] address[0xfecff000] gsi_base[0])
IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 16, version 0, address 0xfecff000, GSI 0-2
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0f] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[3])
IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 15, version 0, address 0xfec00000, GSI 3-38
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0e] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[39])
IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 14, version 0, address 0xfec01000, GSI 39-74
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 1 global_irq 4 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 5 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 3 global_irq 6 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 4 global_irq 7 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 6 global_irq 9 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 7 global_irq 10 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 8 global_irq 11 low edge)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 12 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 12 global_irq 15 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 13 global_irq 16 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 14 global_irq 17 low edge)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 15 global_irq 18 dfl dfl)
It turns out that the system has three io apic controllers, but
boot ioapic routing is in the second one, and that gsi_base is
not 0 - it is using a bunch of INT_SRC_OVR...
So these recent changes:
1. one set routing for first io apic controller
2. assume irq = gsi
... will break that system.
So try to remap those gsis, need to seperate boot_ioapic_idx
detection out of enable_IO_APIC() and call them early.
So introduce boot_ioapic_idx, and remap_ioapic_gsi()...
-v2: shift gsi with delta instead of gsi_base of boot_ioapic_idx
-v3: double check with find_isa_irq_apic(0, mp_INT) to get right
boot_ioapic_idx
-v4: nr_legacy_irqs
-v5: add print out for boot_ioapic_idx, and also make it could be
applied for current kernel and previous kernel
-v6: add bus_irq, in acpi_sci_ioapic_setup, so can get overwride
for sci right mapping...
-v7: looks like pnpacpi get irq instead of gsi, so need to revert
them back...
-v8: split into two patches
-v9: according to Eric, use fixed 16 for shifting instead of remap
-v10: still need to touch rsparser.c
-v11: just revert back to way Eric suggest...
anyway the ioapic in first ioapic is blocked by second...
-v12: two patches, this one will add more loop but check apic_id and irq > 16
Reported-by: Iranna D Ankad <iranna.ankad@...ibm.com>
Bisected-by: Iranna D Ankad <iranna.ankad@...ibm.com>
Tested-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: len.brown@...el.com
LKML-Reference: <4B8A321A.1000008@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 28 ++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ static struct {
static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(void)
{
- int apic_id = 0, pin, idx, irq;
+ int apic_id, pin, idx, irq;
int notcon = 0;
struct irq_desc *desc;
struct irq_cfg *cfg;
@@ -1492,14 +1492,7 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(vo
apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, KERN_DEBUG "init IO_APIC IRQs\n");
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
- if (!acpi_disabled && acpi_ioapic) {
- apic_id = mp_find_ioapic(0);
- if (apic_id < 0)
- apic_id = 0;
- }
-#endif
-
+ for (apic_id = 0; apic_id < nr_ioapics; apic_id++)
for (pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_registers[apic_id]; pin++) {
idx = find_irq_entry(apic_id, pin, mp_INT);
if (idx == -1) {
@@ -1521,6 +1514,9 @@ static void __init setup_IO_APIC_irqs(vo
irq = pin_2_irq(idx, apic_id, pin);
+ if ((apic_id > 0) && (irq > 16))
+ continue;
+
/*
* Skip the timer IRQ if there's a quirk handler
* installed and if it returns 1:
@@ -4083,27 +4079,23 @@ int acpi_get_override_irq(int bus_irq, i
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
void __init setup_ioapic_dest(void)
{
- int pin, ioapic = 0, irq, irq_entry;
+ int pin, ioapic, irq, irq_entry;
struct irq_desc *desc;
const struct cpumask *mask;
if (skip_ioapic_setup == 1)
return;
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
- if (!acpi_disabled && acpi_ioapic) {
- ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(0);
- if (ioapic < 0)
- ioapic = 0;
- }
-#endif
-
+ for (ioapic = 0; ioapic < nr_ioapics; ioapic++)
for (pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_registers[ioapic]; pin++) {
irq_entry = find_irq_entry(ioapic, pin, mp_INT);
if (irq_entry == -1)
continue;
irq = pin_2_irq(irq_entry, ioapic, pin);
+ if ((ioapic > 0) && (irq > 16))
+ continue;
+
desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists