linux-kernel - [20/54] md/raid10: fix deadlock with unaligned read during resync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100812000125.076509548@clark.site>
Date:	Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:00:35 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: [20/54] md/raid10: fix deadlock with unaligned read during resync

2.6.34-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>

commit 51e9ac77035a3dfcb6fc0a88a0d80b6f99b5edb1 upstream.

If the 'bio_split' path in raid10-read is used while
resync/recovery is happening it is possible to deadlock.
Fix this be elevating ->nr_waiting for the duration of both
parts of the split request.

This fixes a bug that has been present since 2.6.22
but has only started manifesting recently for unknown reasons.
It is suitable for and -stable since then.

Reported-by:  Justin Bronder <jsbronder@...too.org>
Tested-by:  Justin Bronder <jsbronder@...too.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/md/raid10.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -825,11 +825,29 @@ static int make_request(struct request_q
 		 */
 		bp = bio_split(bio,
 			       chunk_sects - (bio->bi_sector & (chunk_sects - 1)) );
+
+		/* Each of these 'make_request' calls will call 'wait_barrier'.
+		 * If the first succeeds but the second blocks due to the resync
+		 * thread raising the barrier, we will deadlock because the
+		 * IO to the underlying device will be queued in generic_make_request
+		 * and will never complete, so will never reduce nr_pending.
+		 * So increment nr_waiting here so no new raise_barriers will
+		 * succeed, and so the second wait_barrier cannot block.
+		 */
+		spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
+		conf->nr_waiting++;
+		spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
+
 		if (make_request(q, &bp->bio1))
 			generic_make_request(&bp->bio1);
 		if (make_request(q, &bp->bio2))
 			generic_make_request(&bp->bio2);
 
+		spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
+		conf->nr_waiting--;
+		wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
+
 		bio_pair_release(bp);
 		return 0;
 	bad_map:


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/