[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100811235502.128562677@clark.site>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:54:53 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
Subject: [072/111] Btrfs: check return value of open_bdev_exclusive properly
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
commit 7f59203abeaf18bf3497b308891f95a4489810ad upstream.
Hit this problem while testing RAID1 failure stuff. open_bdev_exclusive
returns ERR_PTR(), not NULL. So change the return value properly. This
is important if you accidently specify a device that doesn't exist when
trying to add a new device to an array, you will panic the box
dereferencing bdev.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1434,8 +1434,8 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_r
return -EINVAL;
bdev = open_bdev_exclusive(device_path, 0, root->fs_info->bdev_holder);
- if (!bdev)
- return -EIO;
+ if (IS_ERR(bdev))
+ return PTR_ERR(bdev);
if (root->fs_info->fs_devices->seeding) {
seeding_dev = 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists