linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/ocfs2/dlm: Eliminate update of list_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:31:41 -0700
From:	Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...cle.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc:	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/ocfs2/dlm: Eliminate update of
 list_for_each_entry loop cursor

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:46:13AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
 
> This seems a bit ugly to me, since it exposes the implementation of the 
> list abstraction.  What about the following:

	Actually, we're going to go back to the original list_for_each()
and list_entry() version.  It's a well understood idiom.
	We're also going to re-audit the rest of the patch that changed
list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry(), just in case we missed another
semantic error.

Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #30

	"Never buy a house without a fireplace."

Joel Becker
Consulting Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@...cle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/