[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E3F3D3E1-4DF7-47E3-895D-95F6BC22CCC4@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:47:27 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
david@...g.hm, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz,
florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, menage@...gle.com,
david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org,
swmike@....pp.se, galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
Felipe,
One thing I'm not clear on --- what's your goal? Is your goal to keep suspend-blockers out of the kernel? Is it to try to convince the android team suspend-blockers are a bad idea and to change Android to not use them? Is it to push some other agenda? Is it to discourage the Android team from trying to waste more time trying to get suspend-blockers (or equivalent functionality) from being added into the kernel?
You seem to be arguing quite passionately, but I'm not sure what you're trying to do.
-- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists