| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:47:27 -0400 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU> To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com> Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, david@...g.hm, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz, florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, menage@...gle.com, david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org, swmike@....pp.se, galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three Felipe, One thing I'm not clear on --- what's your goal? Is your goal to keep suspend-blockers out of the kernel? Is it to try to convince the android team suspend-blockers are a bad idea and to change Android to not use them? Is it to push some other agenda? Is it to discourage the Android team from trying to waste more time trying to get suspend-blockers (or equivalent functionality) from being added into the kernel? You seem to be arguing quite passionately, but I'm not sure what you're trying to do. -- Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists