[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100812144142.GY23755@8bytes.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:41:43 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Herrmann3, Andreas" <Andreas.Herrmann3@....com>,
"Seidel, Conny" <Conny.Seidel@....com>,
"Sarathy, Bhavna" <Bhavna.Sarathy@....com>,
"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86-32: Fix crashes with CPU hotplug on AMD
machines
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:14:14AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/05/2010 12:45 AM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> Correct, again. It's unclear to me if we can get away with the very
> simple 64-bit approach -- in particular, not including all the 1:1
> mappings in the kernel -- for all future users, though.
Yeah, We could probably use the same symbol names for the trampoline and
the swapper page-table on 32 and 64 bit and merge the code that handles
it between the architectures. Shouldn't be too difficult. We cook
something up :-)
But do you mind to take this patch first? It fixes the occurence of an
erratum on AMD hardware, it is a quite simple fix compared to the rework
suggested. In fact, I would like to have a simple patch to fix the
problem first (and backport it as necessary) and then go the way to
rework the current code differences between 32 and 64 bit.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists