[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1281643623.6772.78.camel@nimitz>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:07:03 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] v5 De-couple sysfs memory directories from memory
sections
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This set of patches allows for each directory created in sysfs
> > to cover more than one memory section. The default behavior for
> > sysfs directory creation is the same, in that each directory
> > represents a single memory section. A new file 'end_phys_index'
> > in each directory contains the physical_id of the last memory
> > section covered by the directory so that users can easily
> > determine the memory section range of a directory.
>
> What you're proposing appears to be a non-back-compatible
> userspace-visible change. This is a big issue!
Nathan, one thought to get around this at the moment would be to bump up
the size that we export in /sys/devices/system/memory/block_size_bytes.
I think you have already done most of the hard work to accomplish
this.
You can still add the end_phys_index stuff. But, for now, it would
always be equal to start_phys_index.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists