[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100812000615.816894818@clark.site>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:05:49 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [34/67] eCryptfs: Handle ioctl calls with unlocked and compat functions
2.6.35-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit c43f7b8fb03be8bcc579bfc4e6ab70eac887ab55 upstream.
Lower filesystems that only implemented unlocked_ioctl weren't being
passed ioctl calls because eCryptfs only checked for
lower_file->f_op->ioctl and returned -ENOTTY if it was NULL.
eCryptfs shouldn't implement ioctl(), since it doesn't require the BKL.
This patch introduces ecryptfs_unlocked_ioctl() and
ecryptfs_compat_ioctl(), which passes the calls on to the lower file
system.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/469664
Reported-by: James Dupin <james.dupin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/ecryptfs/file.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/file.c
@@ -292,12 +292,40 @@ static int ecryptfs_fasync(int fd, struc
return rc;
}
-static int ecryptfs_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
- unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
+static long
+ecryptfs_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+{
+ struct file *lower_file = NULL;
+ long rc = -ENOTTY;
+
+ if (ecryptfs_file_to_private(file))
+ lower_file = ecryptfs_file_to_lower(file);
+ if (lower_file && lower_file->f_op && lower_file->f_op->unlocked_ioctl)
+ rc = lower_file->f_op->unlocked_ioctl(lower_file, cmd, arg);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+static long
+ecryptfs_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+{
+ struct file *lower_file = NULL;
+ long rc = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
+
+ if (ecryptfs_file_to_private(file))
+ lower_file = ecryptfs_file_to_lower(file);
+ if (lower_file && lower_file->f_op && lower_file->f_op->compat_ioctl)
+ rc = lower_file->f_op->compat_ioctl(lower_file, cmd, arg);
+ return rc;
+}
+#endif
const struct file_operations ecryptfs_dir_fops = {
.readdir = ecryptfs_readdir,
- .ioctl = ecryptfs_ioctl,
+ .unlocked_ioctl = ecryptfs_unlocked_ioctl,
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+ .compat_ioctl = ecryptfs_compat_ioctl,
+#endif
.open = ecryptfs_open,
.flush = ecryptfs_flush,
.release = ecryptfs_release,
@@ -313,7 +341,10 @@ const struct file_operations ecryptfs_ma
.write = do_sync_write,
.aio_write = generic_file_aio_write,
.readdir = ecryptfs_readdir,
- .ioctl = ecryptfs_ioctl,
+ .unlocked_ioctl = ecryptfs_unlocked_ioctl,
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+ .compat_ioctl = ecryptfs_compat_ioctl,
+#endif
.mmap = generic_file_mmap,
.open = ecryptfs_open,
.flush = ecryptfs_flush,
@@ -322,20 +353,3 @@ const struct file_operations ecryptfs_ma
.fasync = ecryptfs_fasync,
.splice_read = generic_file_splice_read,
};
-
-static int
-ecryptfs_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
- unsigned long arg)
-{
- int rc = 0;
- struct file *lower_file = NULL;
-
- if (ecryptfs_file_to_private(file))
- lower_file = ecryptfs_file_to_lower(file);
- if (lower_file && lower_file->f_op && lower_file->f_op->ioctl)
- rc = lower_file->f_op->ioctl(ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(inode),
- lower_file, cmd, arg);
- else
- rc = -ENOTTY;
- return rc;
-}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists