linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100813113033.4bf911b6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:30:33 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc:	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...e.de,
	galibert@...ox.com, florian@...kler.org, menage@...gle.com,
	swmike@....pp.se, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread,
 take three

> I guess I don't, either -- there are some parts of the kernel used by only a
> handful of users... and here we speak about million users...

Because in general the bits for a small user base don't leak out into
other bits of the kernel. It's a much higher barrier if you want to
affect other people's code because it is asking everyone else to help
maintain stuff they don't need.

That's not to say sometimes its not the right choice, but I still find it
remarkable that nobody else but Android seems to want it,.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/