[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimGHYZ4ndznJY-vjBb164xMSiGMeoJs=9=baSFi@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:28:27 +0300
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
david@...g.hm, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arve@...roid.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, pavel@....cz,
florian@...kler.org, rjw@...k.pl, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, menage@...gle.com,
david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...e.de, arjan@...radead.org,
swmike@....pp.se, galibert@...ox.com, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:52:22PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> 4) no, we can't say anything about what opportunistic suspend means in practice
>
> Here I disagree. The Android folks have used it for quite some time.
> We might not be able to apply their experience directly to other software
> stacks, but we should nevertheless be able to learn quite a bit from it.
So when it comes to practice you are relying solely on what Android people say.
If it's true that it's easy to spot the "PM-driving applications",
then it shouldn't be hard for a guy from the Android team to assemble
a basic typical system (X.org, dbus, etc.) with suspend-blockers in a
couple of days.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists