[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100813215413.GA21607@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:54:13 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: khc@...waw.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ARM: 2.6.3[45] PCI regression (IXP4xx and PXA?)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:23:53PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:25:32 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > It doesn't break dmabounce.
> >
> > What it breaks is the fact that a PCI device which can do 32-bit DMA is
> > connected to a PCI bus which can only access the first 64MB of memory
> > through the host bridge, but the system has more than 64MB available.
> >
> > Allowing a 32-bit DMA mask means that dmabounce can't detect that memory
> > above 64MB needs to be bounced to memory below the 64MB boundary.
>
> But dmabounce doesn't look at dev->coherent_dma_mask.
>
> The change breaks __dma_alloc_buffer()? If we set dev->coherent_dma_mask
> to DMA_BIT_MASK(32) for ixp4xx's pci devices, __dma_alloc_buffer()
> doesn't use GFP_DMA.
With an incorrect coherent_dma_mask, dma_alloc_coherent() will return
memory outside of the 64MB window. This means that when dmabounce comes
to allocate the replacement buffer, it gets a buffer which won't be
accessible to the DMA controller - which is a condition it doesn't check
for.
Ergo, it breaks dmabounce.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists