linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Add support for the Fintek F71808E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C651800.6030804@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:01:36 +0200
From:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:	Giel van Schijndel <me@...tis.eu>
CC:	Laurens Leemans <laurens@...nips.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Add support for the Fintek F71808E

Hi,

On 08/10/2010 09:11 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:36:22PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 08/01/2010 03:30 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>>> Allow device probing to recognise the Fintek F71808E.
>>>
>>> Sysfs interface:
>>>    * Fan/pwm control is the same as for F71889FG
>>
>> My datasheet strongly disagrees with this ...
>
> I just noticed this patch was applied to mainline anyway.  Regardless, I
> will (try to) address these issues you raised.
>
> Right now however, I am prioritising personal stuff above this
> driver---bachelor's thesis and graduation presentation.  When finished
> with that (september) I'll allocate time to these issues again.
>

I've send a mail directly to akpm asking for this to be removed, hopefully
this will help.

> PPS I do have a patch ready that addresses some of the issues you
>      raised.  Those are only the cosmetic changes though (e.g. change
>      naming of chip, comment updates, etc.).  Would you suggest me to
>      send it right now already or wait until I have time to address the
>      other issues as well?

My goal for 2.6.36 is to pull the patch, and then we can wait til all
issues are fixed properly before re-introducing it.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/