[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=qDBpN-6Ro833nHXY5P5OcvFbBrjYW9A4ewREP@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:28:39 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, wylda@...ny.cz
Subject: Re: Call traces w/ 2.6.35.2 (not w/ 2.6.35.1 plus 2.6.35.2-rc1)
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 08:36:30AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Hope this helps to give an overview what has changed:
[...]
>
> I still fail to understand what you are trying to show here at all.
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
>
I was trying to show you that the patches in .35.2-rc1 and .35.2 are
not the same.
Normally, the rcX patches become the final ones.
Unfortunately, I was too lazy to check the names of the patches and
simply compared the files that have been modified (lines beginning
with "diff --git a/file b/file").
In the meantime, Mr./Mrs.(?) "wylda" (sorry, don't know if first or
last name) bisected the problem [1].
The confusing part for me is why "fresh" upstream patches entered a
2.6.35.y fix-series.
I can't say if only i386 is concerned, but as
mm: fix missing page table unmap for stack guard page failure case
mm: keep a guard page below a grow-down stack segment
are also upstream patches, I think the both cause problems for
.35-gitX also [2].
- Sedat -
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16588
[2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16588#c5
[3] [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/14/54
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists