linux-kernel - Re: Call traces w/ 2.6.35.2 (not w/ 2.6.35.1 plus 2.6.35.2-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100814173345.GA27025@suse.de>
Date:	Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:33:45 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, wylda@...ny.cz
Subject: Re: Call traces w/ 2.6.35.2 (not w/ 2.6.35.1 plus 2.6.35.2-rc1)

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 05:28:39PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 08:36:30AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> Hope this helps to give an overview what has changed:
> [...]
> >
> > I still fail to understand what you are trying to show here at all.
> >
> > confused,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> 
> I was trying to show you that the patches in .35.2-rc1 and .35.2 are
> not the same.

Yes, I know that, I did the release :)

> Normally, the rcX patches become the final ones.
> 
> Unfortunately, I was too lazy to check the names of the patches and
> simply compared the files that have been modified (lines beginning
> with "diff --git a/file b/file").
> 
> In the meantime, Mr./Mrs.(?) "wylda" (sorry, don't know if first or
> last name) bisected the problem [1].
> 
> The confusing part for me is why "fresh" upstream patches entered a
> 2.6.35.y fix-series.

They were deemed necessary for inclusion.

> I can't say if only i386 is concerned, but as
> 
> mm: fix missing page table unmap for stack guard page failure case
> mm: keep a guard page below a grow-down stack segment
> 
> are also upstream patches, I think the both cause problems for
> .35-gitX also [2].

Yes, Linus just posted a potential fix.  Can you try that out?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/