[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100815225359.GA32152@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:53:59 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: acme@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: callchain sampling bug in perf?
I'm trying to play with perf record -g, that is sampling the callchains.
Doing this with simple workloads works fine, but when I try to do this
with compilebench a lot of samples seem to get lost.
I'm doing the following:
perf probe --add xlog_sync
perf record -g -e probe:xlog_sync -- ./compilebench
Trying to report it I do not get any callchains at all:
[root@...tlab106 compilebench-0.6]# perf report -g flat -n
# Events: 9K cycles
#
# Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ .......... ............ ................. .........
#
70.41% 6757 compilebench [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xlog_sync
22.61% 2170 sync [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xlog_sync
3.89% 373 sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xlog_sync
2.50% 240 python [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xlog_sync
0.33% 32 :3881 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xlog_sync
0.13% 12 :3971 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xlog_sync
0.11% 11 :3956 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xlog_sync
0.01% 1 :3972 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xlog_sync
Doing a perf report -g flat,0.0 -n shows lots of callgraph, but the
percentag for them doesn't add up at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists