linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] netpoll: use non-BH variant of RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100814.235033.02286546.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 14 Aug 2010 23:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linville@...driver.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: use non-BH variant of RCU

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:51:57 -0400

> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:29:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> But all in all, mightn't it be easier to remove the checks from
>> _local_bh_enable(), and then just use rcu_read_lock_bh()?  Have those
>> checks really been that helpful in finding bugs?  ;-)
> 
> You are right.  It would be much simpler to simply have it not
> warn.

For now I'm going to assume that this is how the issue will be
addressed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/