linux-kernel - RS485: ioctls defined twice ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C67F815.8020808@evidence.eu.com>
Date:	Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:22:13 +0200
From:	Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>
To:	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Rick Bronson <rick@....org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RS485: ioctls defined twice ?

Hi all,

	is there any reason why ioctls TIOCGRS485 and TIOCSRS485 are defined (with the same values) in both include/asm-generic/ioctls.h and arch/arm/include/asm/ioctls.h ?

The same happens also for avr32, powerpc and cris (which, however, defines a different value for TIOCSRS485).

Is it duplicated code ?

Or should these values stay in both asm/ioctls.h and asm-generic/ioctls.h ?

Many thanks,

	Claudio


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/