[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1281929408.3530.1.camel@clockmaker-el6>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:30:08 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Adam Jackson <ajax@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Intel graphics CPU usage - SDVO detect bogosity?
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 19:32 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I started wondering why 'top' was showing an otherwise idle system as
> having a load average of 0.5+, and worker threads constantly using the
> CPU.
>
> So I did a system-wide profile, and got the attached output (look at
> it in a really wide terminal).
>
> There seems to be something _seriously_ wrong with i915 SDVO detect.
> This is on an Apple Mac Mini (hey, your favorite problem child!), and
> apparently it spends 20% of its non-idle CPU time just doing udelay's
> for the i2c SDVO connection detection.
>
> That sounds a bit wrong, doesn't it?
At least we should replace mdelay with msleep in those functions.
Can you get a boot with drm.debug=4?
I wonder are we picking up a bad SDVO, the insane code retries 50 times
with a hard loop delay.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists