linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] Notes from the Boston Linux Power Management Mini-summit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:49:14 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linux Power Management List <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Notes from the Boston Linux Power Management
	Mini-summit - August 9th, 2010

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 01:36:33AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:

> A gap:
> 
> On OMAP, bus control is independent of CPU frequency control,
> so cpufreq and cpuidle don't quite fit the bill.
> 
> Perhaps a "bus-idle" analogous to "cpu-idle" may be appropriate?

FWIW this applies to a bunch of other embedded processors too - OMAP
isn't particularly unique here, though it's one of the furthest along in
terms of exploting this in mainline Linux.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/