[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100816155022.GD13095@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:50:23 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@...auone-net.jp>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't use brace expansion.
Em Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:43:47PM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch escreveu:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 12:29 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > More seriously, so there is a reason for that to be like that and you're
> > not aware of any other shorter or more convenient way of achieving that
> One (obvious) alternative is to have rules triggering on the
> non-existence of these directories.
Can you provide those please?
> > goal, right?
> Hmm, I'm not a "perf person". Which are the sufficient use-cases/tests
> that one can do to play around with the Makefile?
>
> `make -C tools/perf` is probably not enough.
Right, not enough, what those mkdir calls were added for was exactly for
a different usecase:
make -C tools/perf -O=~/build/perf/
So that it doesn't pollutes the source code directories with the object
files, behaving in a similar fashion as when using O= in the kernel
proper.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists