Message-ID: <1281978469.3268.55.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:07:49 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: [LOCKDEP BUG][2.6.36-rc1] xt_info_wrlock?

Hi, I hit this when booting 2.6.36-rc1:

=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.36-rc1 #2937
---------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
ifup-eth/3288 [HC0[0]:SC1[2]:HE1:SE0] takes:
 (&(&lock->lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables]
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
  [<ffffffff8107b08e>] __lock_acquire+0x756/0x93c
  [<ffffffff8107b374>] lock_acquire+0x100/0x12d
  [<ffffffff813f4ec3>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73
  [<ffffffffa01664b1>] get_counters+0xb2/0x168 [ip6_tables]
  [<ffffffffa01665a3>] alloc_counters+0x3c/0x47 [ip6_tables]
  [<ffffffffa0167a7b>] do_ip6t_get_ctl+0x10c/0x363 [ip6_tables]
  [<ffffffff813863a2>] nf_sockopt+0x5a/0x86
  [<ffffffff813863e6>] nf_getsockopt+0x18/0x1a
  [<ffffffffa034c1ff>] ipv6_getsockopt+0x84/0xba [ipv6]
  [<ffffffffa0353289>] rawv6_getsockopt+0x42/0x4b [ipv6]
  [<ffffffff81355571>] sock_common_getsockopt+0x14/0x16
  [<ffffffff813525bb>] sys_getsockopt+0x7a/0x9b
  [<ffffffff8100ad32>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
irq event stamp: 40
hardirqs last  enabled at (40): [<ffffffff813f5ad5>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x79
hardirqs last disabled at (39): [<ffffffff813f5036>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0x92
softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104975a>] copy_process+0x40e/0x11ce
softirqs last disabled at (9): [<ffffffff8100bc9c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:
3 locks held by ifup-eth/3288:
 #0:  (&idev->mc_ifc_timer){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8105841c>] run_timer_softirq+0x1f5/0x3e6
 #1:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffffa03578ca>] mld_sendpack+0x0/0x3ab [ipv6]
 #2:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff81384f83>] nf_hook_slow+0x0/0x119

stack backtrace:
Pid: 3288, comm: ifup-eth Not tainted 2.6.36-rc1 #2937
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81077ae6>] print_usage_bug+0x1a4/0x1b5
 [<ffffffff810164fa>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x4c
 [<ffffffff8106cd0c>] ? local_clock+0x40/0x59
 [<ffffffff810786b6>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xcf
 [<ffffffff81077de1>] mark_lock+0x2ea/0x51f
 [<ffffffff8107b014>] __lock_acquire+0x6dc/0x93c
 [<ffffffff8106cd0c>] ? local_clock+0x40/0x59
 [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ? ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables]
 [<ffffffff8107b374>] lock_acquire+0x100/0x12d
 [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ? ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables]
 [<ffffffff81011149>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xd
 [<ffffffff813f4ec3>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73
 [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ? ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables]
 [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables]
 [<ffffffff810771db>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x9e
 [<ffffffff81384f83>] ? nf_hook_slow+0x0/0x119
 [<ffffffffa010601c>] ip6table_filter_hook+0x1c/0x20 [ip6table_filter]
 [<ffffffff81384f40>] nf_iterate+0x46/0x89
 [<ffffffffa035627b>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x5c [ipv6]
 [<ffffffff8138501b>] nf_hook_slow+0x98/0x119
 [<ffffffffa035627b>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x5c [ipv6]
 [<ffffffffa0349557>] ? icmp6_dst_alloc+0x0/0x1b2 [ipv6]
 [<ffffffffa0357b01>] mld_sendpack+0x237/0x3ab [ipv6]
 [<ffffffff81051475>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xc7/0xeb
 [<ffffffffa0358390>] mld_ifc_timer_expire+0x254/0x28d [ipv6]
 [<ffffffff810584ed>] run_timer_softirq+0x2c6/0x3e6
 [<ffffffff8105841c>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x1f5/0x3e6
 [<ffffffffa035813c>] ? mld_ifc_timer_expire+0x0/0x28d [ipv6]
 [<ffffffff8105169e>] ? __do_softirq+0x79/0x247
 [<ffffffff81051763>] __do_softirq+0x13e/0x247
 [<ffffffff8100bc9c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
 [<ffffffff8100d32f>] do_softirq+0x4b/0xa3
 [<ffffffff8105120a>] irq_exit+0x4a/0x95
 [<ffffffff813fc185>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0x9a
 [<ffffffff8100b753>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff8102c72a>] ? native_flush_tlb_global+0x2b/0x32
 [<ffffffff81031fec>] kernel_map_pages+0x12c/0x142
 [<ffffffff810cc89a>] free_pages_prepare+0x14c/0x15d
 [<ffffffff810cc9c8>] free_hot_cold_page+0x2d/0x165
 [<ffffffff810ccb2b>] __free_pages+0x2b/0x34
 [<ffffffff810ccb7d>] free_pages+0x49/0x4e
 [<ffffffff81033871>] pgd_free+0x71/0x79
 [<ffffffff81048b1b>] __mmdrop+0x27/0x54
 [<ffffffff81042c62>] finish_task_switch+0xb4/0xe4
 [<ffffffff81042bae>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xe4
 [<ffffffff810096e7>] ? __switch_to+0x1a9/0x297
 [<ffffffff81042df3>] schedule_tail+0x30/0xa7
 [<ffffffff8100ac33>] ret_from_fork+0x13/0x80

I noticed in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c in get_counters() as with
other "get_counters()" functions do not block bottom halves anymore as
to this commit:

commit 24b36f0193467fa727b85b4c004016a8dae999b9
Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date:   Mon Aug 2 16:49:01 2010 +0200

    netfilter: {ip,ip6,arp}_tables: dont block bottom half more than necessary
    
    We currently disable BH for the whole duration of get_counters()

Now we take xt_info_wrlock(cpu) lock out of BH disabling. And that lock
even has the following comment:

/*
 * The "writer" side needs to get exclusive access to the lock,
 * regardless of readers.  This must be called with bottom half
 * processing (and thus also preemption) disabled.
 */
static inline void xt_info_wrlock(unsigned int cpu)


As lockdep has proven, this is not satisfied.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists