[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100816073701.GF26154@erda.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:37:01 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running
perfctrs
On 12.08.10 14:21:26, Don Zickus wrote:
> > I was testing the patch further, it properly filters perfctr
> > back-to-back nmis. I was able to reliable detect unknown nmis
> > triggered by the nmi button during high load perf sessions with
> > multiple counters, no false positives.
>
> For my own curiousity, what type of high load perf sessions are you using
> to test this. I don't know perf well enough to have it generate events
> across multiple perfctrs.
You put load on all cpus and then start something like the following:
perf record -e cycles -e instructions -e cache-references \
-e cache-misses -e branch-misses -a -- sleep 10
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists