linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: fix faulty XXinput

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinGcY1mRm0pArB9we8M5o3Pc4DLWsk_ndOQC5GS@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:46:17 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: fix faulty XXinput_* calls

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 23:52, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 18:22, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
>>
>> They've been introduced by 987a6c02 ("Input: switch to input_abs_*()
>> access functions") and they appear to be some kind of debug left-over.
>>
>> [Dmitry Torokhov: these are my fault - I added XX prefixes in places where
>>  I wanted to do additional review of the code but failed to actually do
>>  that in these particular instances.]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>
>> ---
>>
>>  drivers/input/joystick/amijoy.c  |    2 +-
>
> Thanks, amijoy.c compiles now.
>
> But hil_kbd.c still doesn't compile:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/hil_kbd.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/hil_kbd.c
>> index ddd5afd..dcc86b9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/hil_kbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/hil_kbd.c
>> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static void hil_dev_handle_ptr_events(struct hil_dev *ptr)
>>                        if (val < input_abs_min(dev, ABS_X + i))
>>                                input_abs_set_min(dev, ABS_X + i, val);
>>                        if (val > input_abs_max(dev, ABS_X + i))
>
> error: implicit declaration of function ‘input_abs_max’.
>
> And indeed, input_abs_max() does not exist, while hil_kbd.c has 4 callers.

Ping? What should these input_abs_max() calls be?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/