[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100817075612.GA5346@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:56:12 +0300
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog and
touch_softlockup_watchdog (v2)
Fix: acpi_os_stall calls touch_nmi_watchdog and touch_softlockup_watchdog
with preemption enabled causing 'BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
code'.
Patch also removes double smp_processor_id call (smp_processor_id itself and
in __get_cpu_var) in __touch_watchdog.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 613bc1f..cb4f4d4 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -116,13 +116,14 @@ static unsigned long get_sample_period(void)
static void __touch_watchdog(void)
{
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
- __get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
+ per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, this_cpu) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
}
void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
{
+ preempt_disable();
__get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = 0;
+ preempt_enable();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
@@ -142,7 +143,10 @@ void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
void touch_nmi_watchdog(void)
{
+ preempt_disable();
__get_cpu_var(watchdog_nmi_touch) = true;
+ preempt_enable();
+
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_nmi_watchdog);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists