[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C6A8A73.1070003@example.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:11:15 +0200
From: Piotr Hosowicz <piotr@...owicz.com>
To: piotr@...owicz.com
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ioctl definition - has it changed recently?
On 16.08.2010 09:59, Piotr Hosowicz wrote:
> On 16.08.2010 09:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 16 August 2010 09:11:33 Piotr Hosowicz wrote:
>>>> and then make it use the unlocked_ioctl operation.
>>>
>>> This I do not know. Can You help me?
>>>
>>
>> Just take a look at all the other patches that went into the
>> kernel to do this for other drivers.
I do not know how to find them. :-(
> You only really
>> need to change the line with .ioctl=... to .unlocked_ioctl=
Ok, this is simple.
>> and change the prototype of the referenced function to
>>
>> static long foo_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned
>> long arg)
>
> int nv_kern_ioctl(struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned
> long);
>
> It seems different. How to change it? Now it works, I built it without
> your remarks, exactly how I described on my blog:
>
> http://phosowicz.jogger.pl/2010/08/15/nvidia-graphics-in-fresh-kernels/
Ok, as I wrote the prototypes differ. What should I do with the inode
parameter?
Regards,
Piotr Hosowicz
--
- Za moich czasów to w sklepach był tylko ocet i denaturat!
- Tato, przestań, że w całym Tesco był tylko ocet i denaturat!
NP: -
NB: 2.6.36-rc1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists