[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87aaolwar8.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:54:03 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps
"Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@...il.com> writes:
>
> 1) Anybody who cares about file system performance is already using
> "noatime" or "relatime", which mitigates the hit greatly.
Consider mtime.
> If the above patch is too slow for some architectures, how about
> making it a configuration option? Call it "CONFIG_1980S_FILE_TICK",
> have it default to YES on the architectures that care and NO on
> anything remotely modern and sane.
>
> OK that's my proposal. Bash away.
I suspect it will be a performance disaster on x86 for VFS intensive
applications on capable file systems. VFS is very performance
critical. These checks lurk on unexpected places too, e.g. on /dev
access.
Even TSC is much slower than just reading the variable.
Also you should check if the file system granuality
even supports it, it's completely wasted on a ext3 for example.
Maybe as a optional sysctl, default to off.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists