[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100817152308.GB5879@lenovo>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:23:08 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running
perfctrs
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:55:25AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 16.08.10 15:06:59, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > I suspect Peter was supposed to be in To: field ;)
>
> It was the attempt to answer 2 mails with one. :)
>
ah, I see ;)
> > Robert, I think we still may miss unknown irq, consider the case when
> > unknown nmi is latched while you handle nmi from perf and what is
> > more interesting several counters may be overflowed. So you set
> > delta small enough and second (unknown nmi) will be in range and
> > treated as being perf back-to-back, or I miss something from patch?
>
> Yes, that's true, but before you have to enable your Infinite
> Improbability Drive.
>
not at all, it's absolutely legit to happen ;)
> -Robert
>
> --
> Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> Operating System Research Center
>
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists