[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100817175851.GA11463@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:58:51 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs.h: introduce functions to get/set file->private_data
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:26:13AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 04:54 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:03:55PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> > > And spatch could also be used to rename private_data to f_private_data
> > > if people really cared....
> > Agreed, that's much better than adding useless accessors.
>
> Against Linus' current, it's ~850KB.
> Anyone really want it?
This clearly shows how big the effort would be to
introduce access functions.
And if the only gain is grepability then such a
cleanup patch is far more convinient.
It takes minimum effort to create and test, and if you can
get ack from Ted and/or Christoph there is a good chance Linus
would take it right before/after -rc1.
You obviously need to convince him that the patch has
seen decent build testing.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists