[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008171153490.21770@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [S+Q3 00/23] SLUB: The Unified slab allocator (V3)
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > I didn't know if that was a debugging patch for me or if you wanted to
> > push that as part of your series, I'm not sure if you actually need to
> > move it to kmem_cache_init() now that slub_state is protected by
> > slub_lock. I'm not sure if we want to allocate DMA objects between
> > kmem_cache_init() and kmem_cache_init_late().
>
> Drivers may allocate dma buffers during initialization.
>
Ok, I moved the DMA cache creation from kmem_cache_init_late() to
kmem_cache_init(). Note: the kasprintf() will need to use GFP_NOWAIT and
not GFP_KERNEL now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists