[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100817045331.GE24726@drongo>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:53:31 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6 v4] perf: Fix race in callchains
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 03:34:06AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Now that software events don't have interrupt disabled anymore in
> the event path, callchains can nest on any context. So seperating
> nmi and others contexts in two buffers has become racy.
>
> Fix this by providing one buffer per nesting level. Given the size
> of the callchain entries (2040 bytes * 4), we now need to allocate
> them dynamically.
>
> v2: Fixed put_callchain_entry call after recursion.
> Fix the type of the recursion, it must be an array.
>
> v3: Use a manual pr cpu allocation (temporary solution until NMIs
> can safely access vmalloc'ed memory).
It would be nice to make these allocations node-local.
Also, I see that we're allocating 4 buffers per cpu on powerpc when we
strictly only need 3, but I don't suppose that really matters.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists