linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100818071022.GD11947@nokia.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:10:22 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
To:	"ext Gopinath, Thara" <thara@...com>
Cc:	"Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)" <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:03:44AM +0200, ext Gopinath, Thara wrote:
>>>No I am not talking about the key values. I was talking about the register offset
>>>for TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY. My question is, is it ok for it to be 0xd or 0xe.
>>>Earlier we were using 0xd and in the new implementation it has been changed to 0xe.
>
>Typo. Earlier we were using 0xe and in the new implementation it has 
>been changed to 0xd.

you're right, I'm not sure how I came up with that value since the TRM 
shows 0x0e, maybe a copy&paste error. Will change patch 1.

-- 
balbi

DefectiveByDesign.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/