linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Makefile: "make kernelrelease" should show the correct full kernel version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:10:36 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Makefile: "make kernelrelease" should show the correct
 full kernel version

On 08/18/10 15:15, Brice Goglin wrote:
> This patch (actually 01ab17887 in 2.6.36-rc1) reveals what looks like a
> problem to me: make kernelrelease always regenerates
> include/config/kernel.release even if it's already more recent than
> include/config/auto.conf. Is this the expected behavior? Do we really
> need include/config/kernel.release to depend on FORCE?
>

I think so, because "LOCALVERSION=" can be given from command line,
so we need to regenerate it.

Or am I missing your point here?

-- 
The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference.
  - Elie Wiesel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/