[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282127719.2747.211.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:35:19 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>
Cc: "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Corentin Chary <corentincj@...aif.net>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] [Resend] ideapad: using EC command to control
rf/camera power
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:36 +0100, Ike Panhc wrote:
>
> Once the rfkill of a laptop is set to block, it is no way to unblock with Linux
> without driver. Thanks for David Woodhouse wrote the first driver solving this.
>
> But the \_SB_.GECN and \_SB_.DECN are only available on Lenovo ideapad S10-3.
> Using EC command to control rf/camera power is better because I believe every
> ideapads which has VPC2004 device in its DSDT has this common method.
>
> This driver is tested and work fine on Lenovo ideapad B550 and ideapad S10-3.
Works for me too (on S10-3); thanks.
It all looks good, although should we have a delay or a schedule or at
least a cpu_relax() in the read_ec_data() and write_ec_cmd() loops?
Those loops should be using time_before() too, rather than open-coding
the comparison.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists