[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282138175.3117.424.camel@odin>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:29:35 +0100
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Sundar R Iyer <sundar.iyer@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500 - fix the logic to remove already
registered regulators in error path
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 21:44 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> In current implementation, ab8500_regulator_info[0].regulator is not
> unregistered if the error happen at i > 0.
>
> This patch fixes the resource leak and also improves the readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> ---
> I think this change is better ( in readability ) than simply change "while (i > 0)" to "while (i >= 0)".
>
> drivers/regulator/ab8500.c | 4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/ab8500.c b/drivers/regulator/ab8500.c
> index dc3f1a4..775688e 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/ab8500.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/ab8500.c
> @@ -368,11 +368,9 @@ static __devinit int ab8500_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register regulator %s\n",
> info->desc.name);
> /* when we fail, un-register all earlier regulators */
> - i--;
> - while (i > 0) {
> + while (--i >= 0) {
> info = &ab8500_regulator_info[i];
> regulator_unregister(info->regulator);
> - i--;
> }
> return err;
> }
Applied.
Thanks
Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists