[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <976203.51076.qm@web111913.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chetan Loke <generationgnu@...oo.com>
To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Cc: scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010...
Ok, pls ignore my first question:
I was trying to access https://lwn.net/Articles/399148/
But I just read:
http://lwn.net/Articles/400589/
Chetan
--- On Wed, 8/18/10, Chetan Loke <generationgnu@...oo.com> wrote:
> From: Chetan Loke <generationgnu@...oo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010...
> To: "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@...b.net>, "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
> Cc: "scst-devel" <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
> Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 2:58 PM
> Hello James and others,
>
> --- On Tue, 8/17/10, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
> wrote:
>
> > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
> > Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010...
> > To: "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@...b.net>
> > Cc: "scst-devel" <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
> > Date: Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 8:30 PM
> > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:20 +0400,
> > Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> > > Hello James,
> > >
> > > Could you comment rumors that decision about
> future
> > Linux SCSI target
> > > subsystem is done as well as other related
> rumors:
> >
> > If this is related to LSF, the notes on the I/O track
> are
> > here:
> >
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/400491/
>
>
> During the open panel, my question was really specific -
>
> Q) What is the future of a SCSI-target subsystem in linux.
> Which
> target engine/subsystem can we expect?
>
> Your answer) There is place for only 1 target-subsystem in
> the Linux scsi stack and in the LSF summit the decision was
> taken to merge LIO. Has that
> decision changed since the summit?
>
> As a scst-user what I would like to understand is, what was
> that decision based on? Because the LSF summit was 'small by
> invitation' only summit. The notes don't give us an insight
> on the selection criteria/merits etc.
>
>
> >
> > > 3. I have heard you said "Vlad wasn't comfortable
> in
> > handing up the
> > > control to the maintainers ... (this is how
> kernel.org
> > works)." I have
> > > no idea what you meant. I have never been asked
> about
> > anything like
> > > that, so I couldn't say anyhow that I'm not
> > comfortable with anything.
> > > Could you clarify that?
> > >
>
> 3) above is something that I emailed Vlad and the scst
> community based on our offline conversation after the open
> panel. If SCST really has licensing issues then I will
> personally stop using SCST. Since Vlad hasn't
> expressed any concerns on the above and neither have you
> commented on it, is it safe to assume that the licensing
> requirement is a non-issue?
>
>
> Chetan Loke
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Scst-devel mailing list
> Scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scst-devel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists